Barry,

   Any user registered evaluators should override the default ones, not the other way around. How are you registering your implementations?

   Edson

2010/3/11 Barry Kaplan <groups1@memelet.com>

As part of my drools-scala project I am implementing evalators for scala
collections. This means that the some default evaluator operators like
"contains" and "memberOf" need to be overridden. My problem is that drools
seems to load the evaluators as defined in meta-infa/(I forget the file
name) in an arbitrary manner. This results in my scala evaluator getting
registered and then the default evaluator getting registered, overriding the
scala evaluator.

Has this variant of extensibility been considered -- not adding evaluators
as that works great -- but overriding a drools implementation? If not, I'll
have to do some internals hacking.

-bk
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Overriding-default-evaluators-tp441342p441342.html
Sent from the Drools - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



--
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com