I was just looking for a more "short hand" syntax, one where I would not need to declare "theOrder".

On the same subject though, I compiled my rules with the DRL/DSL editors in Eclipse (very nice by the way) and I am getting a compilation error being caused by my DSL entry:

[consequence][]Manually release the Order=setManualRelease(drools.getRule().getName());retract(theOrder);


It seems that there is an issue with the retract(theOrder);statement.

The method retract(Order) is undefined for the type Rule_Maximum_Order_Amount_Exceeded_0        

Might you have any idea as to why this would be occurring or exactly what the message is meaning?

Thanks for the help...




"Edson Tirelli" <tirelli@post.com>
Sent by: rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org

09/12/2007 05:55 PM
Please respond to
Rules Users List <rules-users@lists.jboss.org>

To
"Rules Users List" <rules-users@lists.jboss.org>
cc
Subject
Re: [rules-users] Assistance with DSL syntax






  Yes, that is correct.
  Why do you mean by a "cleaner" way?

   []s
   Edson

2007/9/12, Christopher.Mathrusse@sybase.com <Christopher.Mathrusse@sybase.com>:

I'm using a DSL with my DRL file and I've read through the documentation but I've gotten hung-up on the syntax. Below is a rule from my DRL and the expansion in my DSL.


My rule in the DRL:

rule
"Maximum Order Amount Exceeded"
salience
9800
       
when
                  There
is an Order with
                  - an amount that exceeds 100000        

       
then
               Manually release the Order

               

end



My DSL:

[condition][]There is an Order with=Order()

[condition][]- an amount that exceeds {number}=amount >= {number}

[consequence][]Manually release the Order=setManualRelease(drools.getRule().getName());


What I would like to do is add to my consequence the following in red:

[consequence][]Manually release the Order=setManualRelease(drools.getRule().getName());
retract(theOrder);


I know that I would need to modify my condition statement to be able to use the variable theOrder  in my call to retract:

[condition][]There is an Order with=
theOrder : Order()


but is there a cleaner way to achieve this?


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list

rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




--
 Edson Tirelli
 Software Engineer - JBoss Rules Core Developer
 Office: +55 11 3529-6000
 Mobile: +55 11 9287-5646
 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @
www.jboss.com _______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users