oh!

I'm so sorry... typos in XML are impossible to detect :( 
Again, thank you so much for your help. I'll correct this and will use the agenda-groups the way you suggested.

_ miguel



On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com> wrote:
How did you specify the agenda group in the XML? There aren't much
checks being done in XML handling, so it's easy to slip up. Here's how
I interpret the XML schema:

<rule name="myrule">
 <rule-attribute name="agenda-group" value="group42"/>
  ...

-W




2010/5/5 miguel machado <mls.machado@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
> Yeah, i think this might be a bug indeed. I just tried converting to DRL
> using the "dumper" and the agenda-group item doesn't show up in the
> generated DRL file. It is possible that that this tag isn't being
> interpreted for the same reason it isn't being converted into the DRL
> format. Can someone please confirm this?
> Anyway, if this doesn't work.. is there any kind of workaround? Maybe using
> ruleflow-group's or any other technique?
> Thank you.
> _ miguel
>
>
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> If you don't have auto-focus, rules from other agenda groups should not
>> fire.
>> XML should not matter. A bug might be possible, e.g., due to
>> misinterpretation
>> of the rules in XML.
>> -W
>>
>
>
> --
> "To understand what is recursion you must first understand recursion"
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



--
"To understand what is recursion you must first understand recursion"