From my experience, if you want call a method from then clause, it has to be static method.
Bye bye,

Surely you don't mean that only a "static method" can be called in a consequence?!

Also, using 5.3.0 and 5.4.0.Beta2,.I had no problems with a consequence

modify( $ms ){ add( "three", "four" ) }

insert( new MySet( "x", "y" ) );

where both method add and constructor MySet have the signature (String... strings)

But - as in many other situations - using

dialect "mvel"

is to be avoided.

-W

Matteo Cusmai

Il giorno 07/mar/2012 18:10, "womuji" <cmregister@gmail.com> ha scritto:

We are upgrading Drools from 5.1 to 5.3, and running into some issue when
invoking a Java method with
String variable arguments:

methodA(String... params)

how do we invoke this in a drl file? We used to call it in 5.1 as:

objA.methodA({"string1"});

and it works fine. Now in 5.3, it complains that

"unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
objA.methodA([Ljava.lang.Object;)]"

If we tried objA.methodA(new String[]{"string1"});
it complains that
"unable to resolve method using strict-mode:
objA.methodA([Ljava.lang.String;)]"

It passes the rule loading if we change to :

objA.methodA("string1");

but when actually running the rule, we are getting error saying
" unable to resolve method methodA(java.lang.String)"

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/how-to-invoke-java-method-with-variable-arguments-from-drl-file-tp3807314p3807314.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users