On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Ed Staub
<estaub@telcordia.com> wrote:
Salatino,
Thanks for your responses.
I don't see what's relevant in WSHT - but I wasn't very clear about the
problem I'm trying to solve.
We expect to be using Flow to glue together a lot of existing systems, with
existing async API's, largely transported over JMS. They don't have a place
to hold onto a Drools-provided correlation ID - they have ad hoc correlation
ids constructable from common data in the request and response. We will
need to map from these ad hoc ids to the workitem.
>> Cool, are you planning to implement your own work Item?
I haven't worked out where/how to wire this in yet.
I was hoping someone might point me to this being "on the shelf" somewhere!
-Ed
--
View this message in context: http://n3.nabble.com/Resuming-the-Flow-SESSION-ID-PROCESS-INSTANCE-ID-WORKITEM-ID-tp607507p693778.html