No, not irrelevant. I just didn't know how to answer. :)

   A few days ago Michael said something very true: "- A remember sometime ago when I knew everything there were to know about Drools!"...  ;)

   []s
   Edson

  

2009/1/22 Herman Post <Herman.Post@imail.org>

Thanks for responding.  I am evaluating Guvnor for use by non-programmers in my

organization.  A programmer can figure out how to work around issues, but

non-programmers become frustrated quickly, so I think this is important. 

 

Are the other two issues I mentioned irrelevant in your opinion?

 

Thanks,

 

Herm

 

 

From: rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Edson Tirelli
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2009 6:19 PM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] Guvnor Issues

 


   Regarding #3, it is not a Guvnor issue. In fact, if you are declaring types in the DRL file directly, you will face the same limitation. Feel free to open the Jira for #3 against drools-core/drools-compiler. Can't promise I will be able to get to that any time soon, but it is something I think it is worth doing.

   []s
   Edson

2009/1/22 Herman Post <Herman.Post@imail.org>

Hi,

 I've been working with the Model feature in Guvnor 5.M4 and have some questions:

 1.  Is there a way to delete a fact type once created?

 2.  When I declare a field as a Date it gets included as a java.lang.Date and the fact will not validate.

 3.  If I have created two facts, the one created first cannot reference the second one as the type of a field.  The second on can reference the first.  It would be nice to support this forward -referencing feature. 

 I'd be happy to enter any of these in Jira if they are not already present (couldn't find them).

 Thanks,

 Herm


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users




--
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com