The HashSet is created on the fly, just for checking; no data structure needs to be changed.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "check for dups", but that may be because I don't see class the details of class Group.
-W
How are items added to the list? Can you just change the data structure to a set as Wolfgang suggested?
If all the groups are in working memory you can write a rule similar to the following
rule "check for dups"
when
$group1 : Group($index : index)
$group2 : Group(this != $group1, index == $index)
then
System.out.println($group2 + " has a duplicate index ");
end2009/4/17 Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com>Maybe I'm missing something but couldn't you simply create checkGroups as a Set<String>and just compare its size() to $fact.Groups.size() ?
rule check
when
$fact : StrColl( $gr : groups, eval( $gr.size() != (new HashSet( $gr )).size() ) )
then
System.out.println( "failed" );
end
-WOn Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 8:22 AM, campbeln <nicholas.campbell@arc.gov.au> wrote:
I have an ArrayList of strings that I need to ensure are all internally
unique (ie: {"1","2","3"} = OK, {"1","2","1"} = Error). I've managed to
cobble together the code below but I'm running into the "forall w/ an
internal from" issue. I don't believe an upgrade is feasible at the moment,
so are there any alternative solutions?
NOTE: The collection of both $factGroups and $checkGroups is almost
definitely redundant, so please keep any laughing to a minimum =)
rule "BR033"
no-loop true
when
$fact : MyFact()
//# Get 2 copies of all the Groups associated with the $fact
$factGroups : ArrayList() from collect (
Group() from $fact.Groups
)
$checkGroups : ArrayList() from collect (
Group() from $fact.Groups
)
//# Traverse the $factGroups comparing each $currentGroup to the list
//# within $checkGroups, erroring out if something other then 1 is found
forall (
$currentGroup : Group(this memberOf $factGroups)
$test : ArrayList(size != 1) from collect(
Group(this == $currentGroup) from $checkGroups
)
)
then
System.out.println("Failed: BR033");
end
I have found a number of postings that seem to be related, namely
http://www.nabble.com/Best-practice-for-rules-against-multiple-objects-td5621720.html#a5621720
but I've been unable to cobble together a solution thus far. All help is
appreciated!
Thanks!
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Ensure-all-values-in-a-list-are-unique--tp23071079p23071079.html
Sent from the drools - user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users