Zack,

   Thanks for the update and please, do open JIRAs for everything you found that is not working and ping me after.

   I am working on the binding with extra variables issue at the moment. E.g.:

$x : someMap[$y]

   The problem here is that Drools always used a fly weight pattern with no additional inputs for variable bindings. This means it is not possible as of Drools 5.3 to support that kind of variable binding. What I am doing at the moment is implementing a more friendly error message for 5.3. For 5.4 I am discussing it with Mark, but I think we should add support for it.

   Please note that as a work around, in 5.3, you can still bind the variable to the map ($x : someMap) and then on usage apply the key:

foo == $x[$y]

    Edson

2011/10/11 zstlaw <zstlawre@akamai.com>
Ok finished doing some in depth testing on 5.4.  I was wrong on a few
accounts above the internal variable access to a hash still fails only in a
different way.

First off I added a few new methods to my Mailbox object just for testing :

// returns an statically defined inner enum
public FolderType getDefaultFolderType() {
       return FolderType.INBOX;
}

// returns an external enum
public MailType getMailType() {
       return MailType.WORK;
}

// takes a statically defined inner enum and returns an external enum
public MailType getMailTypeForFolderType(FolderType pType) {
       return MailType.WORK;
}

Test I found that generally enums work much better but internal defined
instances still cause problems.  Also there was some asymmetry where
FolderType.INBOX != $folderType was legal but $folderType !=
FolderType.INBOX was not.

I will start opening issues in JIRA but expect I may need to open one or two
large issues and a lot of sub issues to keep clarity.  In particular the
issue with having an assignments and a variable in the same row continues to
be vexing (i.e. $myvar : getFoo($otherVar) always has problems evaluating
$otherVar since it wants to check it as a inner field of the return type and
not a local variable passed to the procedure call.)

Hope some of this can get in the next build.  I have some huge projects
coming up where we really want to use drools but I am having to really
simplify our data to work around some of these issues.

Thanks,
Zack

--
View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Map-errors-and-quirks-tp3404106p3413546.html
Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



--
  Edson Tirelli
  JBoss Drools Core Development
  JBoss by Red Hat @ www.jboss.com