Yes, JBRULES-1611. I just fixed this and committed to revision #25650. It will be in the next release.

   []s
   Edson

2009/3/14 Mark Proctor <mproctor@codehaus.org>

Garrett Conaty wrote:

I've got an odd parse case that I'm hoping the parser wizards could confirm is the same as the bug JBRULES-1611:

This works

not (exists (Event(eval (eventDate.after(CalendarUtil.getDateDaysPast(30)))) from $room.events))


but this doesn't

forall( Event(eval (eventDate.before(CalendarUtil.getDateDaysPast(30)))) from $room.events )

It's like doing math proofs all over again.  Technically I think I've got to fix the logic because !< is >-= rather than >.

I believe there is already a JIIRA for saying that 'from' doesn't work with 'forall'

Thanks,
Garrett

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
  

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

--
 Edson Tirelli
 JBoss Drools Core Development
 JBoss, a division of Red Hat @ www.jboss.com
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users