Hi Michael,

Thanks but we would like to reuse the ServiceImplementation but I can’t pass the RulesRepository to another class. I was hoping to use the In annotation on a constructor so I can pass in the RulesRepository that way but Seam doesn’t allow that.

//@In

//public RulesRepository repository = null;

private RulesRepository repository = null;

//@In

public ServiceImplementation( RulesRepository repository )

{

this.repository = repository;

this.serviceImplementation = new BRMSServiceImplementation( this.repository );

}

No quick fix L I guess I’ll have to read up on Seam.

Thanks for your help,

Len

---

From: rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org [mailto:rules-users-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2008 8:50 PM
To: Rules Users List
Cc: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] BRMS

Hi len. Yes I think if you create you own in annotation and if you recompile that may work. If not recompiling, I am not sure. But if you hack source, we could refactor so the seam stuff is not in the main class. Another approach is to have the brms as a self contained war, and have the service called remotely via the repository service interface (in effect what the web bit does anyway)- that could work better if you don't need to get at the innards. Do you need it embedded in you app ? If so, will need to think some more if you dont want to use seam (basically means refacting in to a separate module the back end bits)

Sent from my iPhone

On 08/02/2008, at 16:09, "Carlsen, Len" <len.carlsen@ubc.ca> wrote:

Hi,

I am looking at the Drools BRMS to see how I can reuse the org.drools.brms.server.ServiceImplementation for other UI toolkits and also be able to create my own meta-data.  So, I created a plain BRMSServiceImplementation and removed Seam and GWT from several other classes and re-wrote the org.drools.brms.server.ServiceImplementation to use BRMSServiceImplementation so the BRMS still works but I am having problems with Seam org.jboss.seam.annotations.In annotation since my BRMSServiceImplementation class uses the ServiceImplementation’s RulesRepository.

I don’t know much about Seam and am wondering if anyone knows if the @In annotation can be replaced (with another annotation???) and set to the constructor instead of a class member variable?

@Name("org.drools.brms.client.rpc.RepositoryService")

@AutoCreate

public class ServiceImplementation

    implements

    RepositoryService {

    @In

    public RulesRepository repository;

Replace with public ServiceImplementation( RulesRepository repository )

If I can get this to work, I’d be happy to submit it to Drools.

Thanks in advance for any help,

Len

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users