Dirk, it should be OK. As when you assert a fact with a change listneer (a dymanic fact) it should call the sync'ed modifyObject just like you would form the outside.
On 2/21/07,
Dirk Bergstrom <dirk@juniper.net> wrote:
This horse has been beaten pretty hard
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.drools.user/3557/focus=3585), but I
have a newish angle on it.
My app has a big collection of business objects (1000 of type X, 10,000 of type
Y, 200 of type Z, etc) asserted into a single working memory. These objects
need to be updated from external sources periodically. Because each object type
has a different source, I'd like to parallelize the updates in separate threads.
Some of the updates involve retraction of expired objects or assertion of new
ones, but most are just changing fields on already-asserted objects (all fields
have PropertyChangeListener (PCL) support).
I think that using a SynchronisedWorkingMemory will handle the assert/retract
updates. Will it be "happy" in the face of PCL changes as well, or do I need to
do something more?
--
Dirk Bergstrom dirk@juniper.net
_____________________________________________
Juniper Networks Inc., Computer Geek
Tel: 408.745.3182 Fax: 408.745.8905
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users