OK, I just solved my own problem. My proxy had no
package, since the jdk based proxy is only in a package if it has at
least 1 non public interface, according to the javadoc.
The suspect code beginning on line 333 is:
String pkgName = cls.getPackage().getName();
if ( "org.drools.reteoo".equals( pkgName ) ||
"org.drools.base".equals( pkgName ) ) {
// We don't shadow internal classes
this.shadowEnabled = false;
return;
}
The getPackage() method returns null. In this case, it would be good
if JBoss Rules handled the null and went on to shadow the object
anyway, since it is obviously not in the org.drools packages.
Now I'll continue trying to build a test case for my original problem.
Shall I enter a JIRA for this issue?
Thanks,
-Chris West
On 7/12/07, Chris West <crayzfishr@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to use objects that are generated as dynamic proxies
(through the java.lang.reflect.Proxy class) as facts in JBoss Rules 4.0
MR3. My project was using CGLib to generate proxies, and they were
working just fine in 3.0.6. However, when I tried 4.0, the CGLib based
proxies seemed to have a final method that kept the proxies from being
proxied as shadow facts. So I rewrote my code to try to use JDK based
proxies, and version 4.0 MR3 accepts them and apparently creates shadow
facts, but now my rules don't fire correctly.
So, in an attempt to create a simple program to illustrate the problem,
I ran into a different problem. The attached eclipse project
illustrates this problem.
The error is:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete$ObjectTypeConf.<init>(Rete.java:333)
at org.drools.reteoo.Rete.assertObject(Rete.java:152)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ReteooRuleBase.assertObject(ReteooRuleBase.java:190)
at
org.drools.reteoo.ReteooWorkingMemory.doInsert(ReteooWorkingMemory.java:70)
at
org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:772)
at org.drools.common.AbstractWorkingMemory.insert
(AbstractWorkingMemory.java:584)
at com.sample.DroolsTest.main(DroolsTest.java:42)
Has anyone successfully used JDK based dynamic proxies as facts?
Thanks,
-Chris West
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users