Yes, because $item1 should be a variable name, which should be bound
to {item}, so it has to be possible to replace $item1 with $item2 or
whatever so i can use the same consequence more than one time.

The DSL Editor shows the correct things i want to have ... but
compiling is not possible

Cheers

Markus

On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Christine <christine@christine.nl> wrote:
> On Mon, May 26, 2008 13:33, Markus Helbig wrote:
>
>> currently i always get that $item1 couldn't not be matched.
>
> I see no "item1" in your DSL, is that correct?
>
> Christine
>
>
>
>> Hi together,
>>
>> i'd like to do the following using a DSL
>>
>> in consequece part of a rule
>>
>> then
>>      Create a new Item $item1
>>      Set name of $item1 to "New Value"
>> end
>>
>> DSL
>>
>> [consequence][]Create a new Item {item}={item}=new Object();
>> [consequence][]Set name of {item} to {value}={item}.setValue({value});
>>
>> currently i always get that $item1 couldn't not be matched.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Thanks in advance, cheers
>>
>> Markus
>> _______________________________________________
>> rules-users mailing list
>> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>
_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users