PotentialTheft ruleflow-group updates a simple String attribute(potentialTheftRating) as shown below. The next step (checkTheftRating used as an example here) uses the potentialTheftRating in the condition. Note that some of the attributes are list of objects where the update is on the attribute of the contained object in the list.

//TheftRating ruleflow-group

rule  "Row 1 PotentialTheft.gdst"
    ruleflow-group  "TheftRating"
    lock-on-active true
   
    dialect  "mvel"
    when
        $car : Vehicle( convertible ==  "true"  )
    then
        System.out.println(" row 1 ");
        //$car.setPotentialTheftRating(  "high" );
        modify($car){
            setPotentialTheftRating(  "high" );
        }
        //update($car);
end

 #from row number: 2
rule  "Row 2 PotentialTheft.gdst"
    ruleflow-group  "TheftRatinggrp"
    dialect  "mvel"
    when
        $car : Vehicle( price >=  "45001" , price <=  "200000" )
    then
        $car.setPotentialTheftRating(  "high" );
        System.out.println("row number: 2");
end

//CheckTheftRating ruleflow-group

rule  "1 CheckTheftRating"
    ruleflow-group "CheckTheftRating"
    salience 100
    dialect  "mvel"
    when
        $car : Vehicle( potentialTheftRating ==  "high"  )
    then
        System.out.println(" CheckTheftRating is true");
end

Regards,
Ravi


On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Tihomir Surdilovic <tsurdilo@redhat.com> wrote:
How about show your code and rules and maybe relevant parts of your
process? Would help understand your situation better.  I would think
creating a simple test case that covers your scenario would not take
long to put together.

Thanks.
On 7/13/11 11:20 AM, Wishing Carebear wrote:
> Any pointers please!!
>
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2011, Wishing Carebear<wishing.carebear@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Any pointers?
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 12, 2011, Wishing Carebear<wishing.carebear@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> If I have a ruleflow with a sequence of rule tasks, should an update be called to reflect the state of the fact in the working memory? In another words If all the rules are mutually exclusive within a rule task, will the changes made in first rule task, if used as a condition in the next rule task will be reflected without calling explicit update.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your time and help.
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
>

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users