Agreed. I think a parallel list for all sub projects of Drools makes sense. From my side I am mostly interested in Planner so a planner-users@lists.jboss.org would also be good for me.


On 15 August 2012 10:18, Wolfgang Laun <wolfgang.laun@gmail.com> wrote:
>From my point of view, the user list is becoming increasingly cluttered with Qs regarding Guvnor, which doesn't interest me at all. A parallel list guvnor-users@lists.jboss.org might help.

-W



On 15 August 2012 10:12, Michael Anstis <michael.anstis@gmail.com> wrote:
Personally, I don't find the user list "high volume".

Perhaps re-categorizing the mailing lists we have works better:-
  • users: newbie type stuff
  • dev (rename drools-tech?): technical questions (not just implementation)
My 2c.

On 15 August 2012 00:33, Salaboy <salaboy@gmail.com> wrote:
Probably a linked in private group can do the job, I dont know if it supports all the features that you mention but at least you have the contacts network to checks who joins and post new topics. With a group of moderators the topics can be restricted easily

Sent from my iPhone

On 14 Aug 2012, at 22:48, Mark Proctor <mproctor@codehaus.org> wrote:

> As the user list is now high volume, i'm contemplating an "invite only" expert list. I'm not sure who this would work, or if it's practical. But the idea is to have a lower volume list, with a higher quality of technical questions and discussions. This might make it easier for people to be engaged.
>
> I'm thinking of doing it as a google group "drools-expert-group" or something.
>
> I'm not entirely sure how to decide who gets an invite or not…. as it's very arbitrary. I guess in general anyone who gets a recommendation for someone on the list, gets an invite. But I'm open to other ideas to run this.
>
> Ideally we should be able to setup a number of moderators, that can handle this invite list, including people from the community. Although not sure if google groups supports this, need to find out.
>
> Anyway would like to here what people think, and would be interest to see alternative ways to do this. Maybe you can point to existing setups, that manage this sort of situation, that we can copy?
>
> Mark
> _______________________________________________
> rules-users mailing list
> rules-users@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users


_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users



_______________________________________________
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users