We are using two repositories currently, one repo will be common for multiple tenants as they have the base rules. Another repo will be having tenant specific rules that are over and above base rules and use the exact models from base rules. Now if we do not keep the models in both the repositories then there are compilation issues in both the repo. If we do keep them in both then there will be an issue with duplicate model declaration when both repos are imported into kbase. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-5-5-0-Final-Package-compilation-... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users

Thanks Mantis for the quick reply. I have updated my query. We have a multi-tenant application. We need to maintain a common set of base rules that will be applicable to all our tenants and then We have few rules that will be per tenant specific. For this, we have created two guvnor repositories, one having a base set of rules with models and another having custom rules. We will be having one repo of second type of repo per tenant. But the problem with this approach is: - if we have models in both the repo types, then there will be duplicates when we import the repos into kbase. - if we have models only in base repo, then we can not compile the rules within custom type repos due to failed model dependency. I would like to know, if this is the right approach or there is another way to accomplish the same? We are using drools-guvnor version 5.5.Final. -- View this message in context: http://drools.46999.n3.nabble.com/Guvnor-5-5-0-Final-How-do-we-maintain-t... Sent from the Drools: User forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ rules-users mailing list rules-users(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users