On 26/07/11 01:51, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
> Hi Shane,
>
> Seam social is in alpha1, but API are now stable enough to enter in beta. This also necessary to add my OAuth contribution to Seam security.
>
> Regarding packaging I'm still wondering if model and controller class for a given service (Twitter for instance) shouldn't be put in a sub module to separate core functions from specific implementations. It will facilitate different lifecycle for each social service support for instance and allow users to only include module they need for their development.
>
> the only issue with that is it would create 2 submodule per service (API and IMPL) and I find it a bit heavy...
>
> What is your opinion on that subject ?
>
> regard,
>
> Antoine SABOT-DURAND
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Le 25 juil. 2011 à 01:33, Shane Bryzak a écrit :
>
>> Just a heads up to everyone that we only have 3 weeks remaining until
>> the beta 1 release for Seam 3.1. It would be appreciated if all module
>> leads could reply to this with a status update for your module, and
>> whether you foresee any issues with delivering a beta for your module
>> within this timeframe.
>>
>> I'd also like to remind everyone that we are getting rid of the shaded
>> (combined) jars, so if you need assistance in doing this for your module
>> please let me know and I can help out.
>>
>> Shane
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>>
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev