Well would ya look at that.... awesome. Looks like I'm your co-lead. Neat :)
I think this should be a separate project... No reason to depend on Faces for Servlet functionality. It could go the other way around, though, in that the Faces module might depend on the Servlet module. I see no harm in that.
For example the Servlet stuff from http://seamframework.org/Documentation/Seam3Modules that we are apparently leading ;-)--On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
It depends. What WEB type things are you thinking of? I think that other modules will be created for non-Faces functionality. Wicket, GWT, etc.On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Nicklas Karlsson <email@example.com> wrote:
Will there be a SEAMWEB or does everything related go under SEAMFACES?On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Dan Allen <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III <email@example.com> wrote:
Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :)That's what the +1 was for. I was just joking around ;)-Dan