The plan is to probably move to github, although we are going to do some (prudent) evaluation first.

On 12/12/09 02:41, Dan Allen wrote:
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:13 AM, psteininger <piotr.steininger@gmail.com> wrote:

Dan,

I support the move to git. I think it will help the community contribute
easier and provide the committers to have more control over what goes into
the master branch. It's a lot easier to work with distributed, published
repos, than with a ton of patch files.

Indeed. We could cite a number of other benefits as well, such as being able to develop locally and to share prototypes w/ collaborators before having to worry about pushing upstream. There have actually been some long threads discussing all of these benefits, so I won't try to rehash it all.

The motion I'm suggesting at this point is, let's just cut over now. No one can build these modules anyway (unless they have seam-parent stashed away in a local Maven repo), so let's just make the leap.

Another reason is that the Seam repository in general is so screwy right now with a ton of restructures (just look at FishEye to see the bizarre history) that we should just break away from it. I don't mean to sound downtrodden, this should be seen as an opportunity!

-Dan

--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
_______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev