Stuart has mentioned in several threads that fakereplace is very close to JRebel in core features, and in some cases perhaps farther along. The big thing that JRebel has is the integrated tooling support and a product w/ support. I applaud their work, but am still very much in support of Stuart's open source and extensible alternative.
I took a look at JRebel at J1. It looked interesting, but as you said it might be nicer to have VM support. We also have concerns over debug support with JRebel, but would need further review. For us ( RichFaces ) it is only really useful for example development anyway since components are created using the CDK.On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Lincoln Baxter, III <lincolnbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:
_______________________________________________Hey (particularty Stuart,)
Have you seen this? http://wikis.sun.com/display/mlvm/HotSwap
Looks interesting...
JVM level support might be a lot nicer (less configuration?) than things like JavaRebel, possibly much faster.
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
blog: http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Jay
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev