On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Stuart Douglas <stuart@baileyroberts.com.au> wrote:
Does anyone have any objection to adding a complete set of AnnotationLiterals for all CDI annotations into weld-extensions?

I remember suggesting (or thinking that) at one point, so I'm for it. Though I believe Pete said that this should be in a spec rev, that any annotation (that would be referenced as a literal) should also define it's literals. That was an approach Seam has started to take, I think.

-Dan
 
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen