On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Lincoln
Baxter, III <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Well would ya look at that.... awesome. Looks like I'm your co-lead.
I think this should be a separate project... No reason to depend on
Faces for Servlet functionality. It could go the other way around,
though, in that the Faces module might depend on the Servlet module. I
see no harm in that.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Nicklas
For example the Servlet stuff from http://seamframework.org/Documentation/Seam3Modules that
we are apparently leading ;-)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM,
Lincoln Baxter, III <email@example.com>
depends. What WEB type things are you thinking of? I think that other
modules will be created for non-Faces functionality. Wicket, GWT, etc.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM,
Nicklas Karlsson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
there be a SEAMWEB or does everything related go under SEAMFACES?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :)
That's what the +1 was for. I was just joking around
Lincoln Baxter, III
"Keep it Simple"
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597