On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 19:10, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak@redhat.com> wrote:
I'd rather keep everything related to a single module contained within a
single group.  Having artifacts spread across multiple groups doesn't
seem tidy to me.

A lot of projects do this, including Weld and RichFaces. It helps people understand what the core artifacts are and what are auxiliary things (in this case examples). I don't think we need the breakdown that Weld does, which is to have subpackages for each UI technology, but having an "examples" folder does make a lot of sense, imho.

Plus, then the artifacts can be named like "rest-tasks" (in all, org.jboss.seam.rest.examples:rest-tasks) <- feel free to revise that scheme.

-Dan
 
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction