On Jan 28, 2011 6:33 PM, "Brian Leathem" <bleathem@gmail.com> wrote:
> Good idea!
>
> Or something like either:
> <version>[3.0.0.Beta2,3.0.1)</version>
> or
> <version>[3.0.0.Beta2,3.1)</version>
>
> That way breaking changes if bound to a version increment, would then
> require modules to re-release.
>
> Brian
>
> On 01/28/2011 03:25 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III wrote:
>> Have we considered using version range specifiers via the maven
>> artifact syntax?
>>
>> If modules used something like:
>>
>> <version>[3.0.0.Beta2,)</version>
>>
>> It would allow more flexibility as we go along / upgrade individual
>> modules. This way we wouldn't need to re-release *everything* when we
>> re-release *one* thing. WDYT? I'm sure there are consequences, but
>> others may have ideas too.
>>
>> ~Lincoln
>
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev