On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Nicklas Karlsson <nickarls@gmail.com> wrote:

+1 for exception. *

No extra.hierarchy.levels

On 7/9/10, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com> wrote:
> In IRC (last week I think) we talked about needing a name for the
> exception handling module (and also package name). It sounded like
> Exceptions was probably the winner in IRC, though we were a little
> torn on package naming (o.j.s.exception, o.j.s.exception.handling,
> etc). Tossing this out there for more ideas, or some sort of
> consensus.
>
> --
> Jason Porter
> http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
> http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
>
> Software Engineer
> Open Source Advocate
>
> PGP key id: 926CCFF5
> PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
> _______________________________________________
> seam-dev mailing list
> seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>

--
Sent from my mobile device

---
Nik

_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

--
Jordan Ganoff