On 02/05/11 06:15, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
These bean are in the API. I Thought about Twitter or
Facebook name but I'm not sure it won't be confusing since I
already have @Twitter or @Facebook qualifiers. Perhaps I'm taking
too much precautions here...
These beans manage the high level API to interact with social
network. They contains methods like updateStatus() or
getTimeLine() for instance.
I think that the 'Service' suffix might be more intuitive for these
classes (i.e. TwitterService). It's also in accord with the
function of the class, being that they interact with social
networking 'services'.
Shane
Le 30 avr. 2011 à 16:29, Lincoln Baxter, III a écrit :
Are these beans that developers will
be interacting with / API? Or are they an implementation
detail?
If the former. Why not just use "Twitter" or "Facebook" ?
"Handler" isn't bad, I'm not sure there's a great word, what
is the purpose of these beans. e.g: what do they do? that
might help us figure out if the name is appropriate, or if
we should try to forge a little more ;)
~Lincoln
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev