I think that the word 'content' is very overloaded. People will see 'Seam JCR' and most will immediately recognize what it is, however 'Seam Content' is more ambiguous. My +1 is for Seam JCR, but I'm open to what other people think.

On 27/02/11 09:44, George Gastaldi wrote:

I prefer the latter also.

seam content is also a strong name than seam jcr

Em 26/02/2011, às 19:46, "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament@gmail.com> escreveu:
George,

Yes, I have basic structure that can be put into both api and impl. No test cases right now though. We can argue over annotation names if you'd like :-)

Shane,

What top level package do you suggest? org.jboss.seam.jcr ? org.jboss.seam.content ? I'd prefer the latter, especially if we do eventually look at implementation specific features.

John
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 5:17 PM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi@gmail.com> wrote:
Excelent! I am thrilled to start working on it. Shane, if you could please create the project that would help.

John, do you have anything implemented to push into this repository ?

Em 26/02/2011, às 18:12, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak@redhat.com> escreveu:
It's great to see this collaboration take place, and it's quite obvious to me that the idea of a Seam JCR module would be appealing to many developers. George and John, would you both be willing to work on this module together? For the time being I propose that we create a Seam JCR project at github (and treat it as a sandbox for now) which you can both commit to. I can put the basic project skeleton in place so that it conforms in structure to the other Seam modules. What do you think?

On 27/02/11 04:08, George Gastaldi wrote:
Excelent idea. I was thinking also to connect the JCR event model to CDI. An integration with Seam Security should also be planned.
I am also available to work on it.

2011/2/26 John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com>

George,

Funny you bring up this topic this week. I was planning to propose a Seam Content module this week, mostly because my schedule is finally clear enough to allow me to work on it. At this point, I have basic capabilities to inject the necessary JCR objects into CDI beans and that all works. I will admit though, I am a little biased towards ModeShape as that is the other JBoss project I work on. Cross platform support would work correctly using the service loader + repository factory approach. In addition to basic injection support, I was also looking to provide the equivalent of a SeamManagedPersistenceContext for JCR.

There are also some ModeShape specific features I was bouncing around, including CDI enabled connectors, sequencers; as well as connecting their event model w/ CDI's event model.

What do you think about those ideas?

John

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:06 AM, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi@gmail.com> wrote:

I was thinking to create a Seam JCR module to allow JCR (Java Content
Repositories) to be injected in code. It should work for jackrabbit as
well as modeshape or any other jcr 2.0 compliant implementation. Any
suggestions ? Comments appreciated.

_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev