On 25 Nov 2009, at 13:07, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Another strong point for using GIT is the Gerrit source review system.
> It makes contributing patches easier, and much more: it makes _applying_ those contributions even easier.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- Pete Muir <
pmuir@redhat.com> schrieb am Mi, 25.11.2009:
>
>> Von: Pete Muir <
pmuir@redhat.com>
>> Betreff: Re: [seam-dev] Mercurial vs GIT
>> An: "Daniel Roth" <
daniel@danielroth.se>
>> CC: "
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org" <
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> Datum: Mittwoch, 25. November 2009, 13:43
>> I can certainly see that a DVCS might
>> not be a good fit for closed source / in company software
>> development. All the work an engineer on the project does is
>> likely to make it into the project at some point (even if
>> heavily refactored), and they are unlikely to want to share
>> it with many other people before it goes into VCS.
>>
>> However if you consider Seam, then there are often cases
>> where someone is maintaining a patch for months or even
>> years against trunk which they want to easily share with
>> other users. As we move towards to a more modular approach,
>> this becomes even more apparent - you might want to develop
>> a module outside the Seam master, and share it with the
>> community. At some point we might add it to the master. I
>> believe a DVCS is ideally suited to this.
>>
>> Pete
>>
>> On 24 Nov 2009, at 22:22, Daniel Roth wrote:
>>
>>> 1) I have not tried GIT...
>>> 2) Comparing Mercurial and SVN, for me, is like
>> comparing an nightmare and ease of use.
>>>
>>> There is a Mercurial plugin for Eclipse, but it's
>> really no good. We experienced some bugs at work with it
>> (DivideByZero), submitted a patch but... Still nothing has
>> happened... I've tried meld, kdiff3 and the tortoise thingy
>> for windows, but still I always end up with command line
>> because things don't work. Also there is really no good way
>> of branching. Named branches is a MESS so even the hg team
>> thinks it's better to crete to different clones and then
>> manually merge them. (See their manual)
>>>
>>> One other thing I'd like to say is that having a
>> distr. repo may sound really fancy, but it's rarely needed.
>> Although being spread over different offices all over the
>> world, that feature is never really needed at my work. And
>> the really really really few times it is, you could just as
>> well make an ordinary patch, and give it to the other
>> person. However, there have been many times when hours has
>> been wasted when trying to resolve issues when two people
>> have worked in our root repo at the same time.
>>>
>>> Just my 10 öre...
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Stuart Douglas
>> <
stuart@baileyroberts.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>> As I understand it GIT support on windows is not good,
>> and also just having a quick google around it looks like the
>> tooling support is not very mature either. Also the commands
>> are different to subversions commands so there is quite a
>> steep learning curve.
>>> I like bazaar, it uses the same commands as
>> subversion, works on all platforms and has eclipse and
>> windows support. It also has launchpad, which is the bzr
>> equivalent of github.
>>>
>>> Stuart
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From:
seam-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org
>> [
seam-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org]
>> On Behalf Of Francisco Jose Peredo [
franciscoperedo@tabasco.gob.mx]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, 25 November 2009 1:17 AM
>>> To:
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> Cc:
weld-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>> Subject: Re: [seam-dev] Mercurial vs GIT
>>>
>>> I have not tried GIT, but from what I have read it is
>> pretty complicated
>>> to learn to use...
>>> OTOH I have tried Mercurial, which is also
>> distributed, and found it
>>> confortable... apparently the
>>> way it deals with its distribute nature is easier for
>> subversion users
>>> to understand...
>>> AFAIK Netbeans source code is in Mercurial, also
>> OpenJDK... So it seems
>>> to work
>>> well with large code bases... and there are plugins
>> for Netbeans,
>>> Eclipse and the Tortoise Hg
>>> project is advanced and usable...
>>> Google Code offers free Mercurial hosting...
>>> Why not Mercurial?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Pete Muir escribió:
>>>> A quick item we discussed at the f2f meeting was
>> whether to switch to
>>>> GIT for our SCM, rather than SVN.
>>>>
>>>> This would give us a IMO a system well suited to
>> our distribued dev
>>>> model, it would also make it much easier for
>> others to sandbox PEs and
>>>> then contribute them back to us.
>>>>
>>>> The proposal is to use Github to host.
>>>>
>>>> The team members at devoxx were in favour, but
>> what do others think?
>>>>
>>>> Pete
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Pete Muir
>>>>
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Pete
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>>
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dirección Informática de Servicios Financieros
>>> Dirección General de Modernización e Innovación
>> Gubernamental
>>> Secretaría de Administración y Finanzas
>>> Paseo de la Sierra 435 col. Reforma
>>> C.P. 86086, Villahermosa, Tabasco.
>>> Tel. 52 + 993 + 310 40 00 Ext. 7127
>>>
http://saf.tabasco.gob.mx/
>>>
>>> IMPORTANTE: Esta transmisión electrónica, incluyendo
>> sus anexos, archivos insertados o "attachments", puede
>> constituir información confidencial o reservada, en los
>> términos de la Ley de Acceso a la Información Pública del
>> Estado de Tabasco, y estar protegida por el derecho
>> fundamental a la privacidad. Se prohibe el uso de esta
>> información por cualquier persona distinta al receptor
>> intencional o previsto. Si usted ha recibibido esta
>> transmisión electrónica por error, por favor responda
>> inmediatamente al emisor y borre esta información de su
>> sistema. El uso, diseminación, distribución o
>> reproducción de esta transmisión electrónica por
>> receptores no intencionados o no previstos por el emisor, no
>> está autorizada y puede considerarse ilícita en los
>> términos de la legislación penal y civil vigente.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Roth
>>> M.Sc. Computer Science
>>>
daniel@danielroth.se
>>>
www.danielroth.se
>>> +46 736 36 29 46
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> seam-dev mailing list
>>>
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>>
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
>
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev