-Dan
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:24 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:
Huh.
Well would ya look at that.... awesome. Looks like I'm your co-lead. Neat :)
I think this should be a separate project... No reason to depend on Faces for Servlet functionality. It could go the other way around, though, in that the Faces module might depend on the Servlet module. I see no harm in that.
WDYT?
--LincolnOn Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Nicklas Karlsson
<nickarls@gmail.com> wrote:
For example the Servlet stuff from http://seamframework.org/Documentation/Seam3Modules that we are apparently leading ;-)
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:
It depends. What WEB type things are you thinking of? I think that other modules will be created for non-Faces functionality. Wicket, GWT, etc.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Nicklas Karlsson
<nickarls@gmail.com> wrote:
Will there be a SEAMWEB or does everything related go under SEAMFACES?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Lincoln Baxter, III
<lincolnbaxter@gmail.com> wrote:
Let's just stick with Ken's original SEAMINTL :)
That's what the +1 was for. I was just joking around ;)
-Dan
--
---
Nik
---
Nik
--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.comhttp://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminactionhttp://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen