-Dan
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 00:12, Jason Porter
<lightguard.jp@gmail.com> wrote:
+1On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:32, Shane Bryzak
<sbryzak@redhat.com> wrote:
We discussed this briefly on IRC, however I thought we should discuss it
on seam-dev before we make any concrete decision. To summarise the plan:
1. Remove the combined jar file from each of the modules
2. If the module has a single implementation, rename it to whatever the
combined jar was called.
E.g. for Seam Catch, the impl module would be called seam-catch.
3. If the module has multiple implementations, then add a suffix to the
artifact name that reflects the individual implementation.
E.g. Seam Reports has two implementations, which would be called
seam-reports-jasper (for Jasper reports) and seam-reports-pentaho (for
Pentaho).
4. Leave the API naming as it is, e.g. seam-reports-api.
The idea is that by importing the simplified module artifact name (i.e.
"seam-xxx") you would get the default implementation, which in turn
depends on the API. The advantage of this is that we won't break
backwards compatibility - e.g. someone currently declaring a dependency
on "seam-catch" in their pom file won't have their app broken when we
rename the modules. Also we remove the complexity introduced by having
a combined jar in the first place.
If you can spot any issues with this, please speak up now ;)
Shane
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
Jason Porter
http://lightguard-jp.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/lightguardjp
Software Engineer
Open Source Advocate
Author of Seam Catch - Next Generation Java Exception Handling
PGP key id: 926CCFF5
PGP key available at: keyserver.net, pgp.mit.edu
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597