Module writers,
For as much as we all enjoy discussing things like naming conventions (not), I do feel that we need to establish some consistency across modules. Rather than devising some arbitrary scheme, I'd rather build on the package name choices that are coming out of the modules and try to align on what seems natural.
Tihomir raised an important point with respect to qualifiers. When doing XML Bean Config, the configuration is clearer if qualifiers are in their own package so they can be bound to a unique namespace prefix. This helps distinguish the qualifier elements from the class elements (like class name, method, field, etc). As for other annotations, Seam has traditionally put them in the "annotations" subpackage, which Shane has done in remoting and security.
So far we have:
= use org.jboss.seam.[module] as your root namespace, where [module] is the SVN folder of your module
= put qualifiers in the "qualifiers" sub-package (should it be singular instead?)
= put annotations in the "annotations" sub-package (should it be singular instead?)
= put event types in the "events" sub-package (should it be singular instead?)
= where applicable, try to align your packages with those in CDI/Weld (for instance, context implementations go in the "context" package)
We'll keep the conventions to the smallest amount possible. If you have suggestions or changes, please bring them forward. It's up to you. But let's remember that what we choose isn't all that important. We just don't want be doing totally different things.
-Dan