For some context on the reasons for bringing jboss-logging into solder, please take a look at http://seamframework.org/Seam3/JBossLoggingIntegration for full details.

In a nutshell it's to enable us to remove the dependency on jboss-logging, while enabling us some flexibility in terms of creating our own annotations, that don't clash with jboss-logging and cause confusion.  The reason being that the annotations within jboss-logging were never intended for developer consumption, they are intended for use within the JBoss AS container.  For this reason the port into solder removes those annotations from jboss-logging, and moves them to a solder package where appropriate.

Feel free to amend the wiki page if there are other items that you feel are of merit.

Thanks
Ken



On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:29 PM, Ken Finnigan <ken@kenfinnigan.me> wrote:
Here's the link to the incorporation of jboss-logging into solder: https://github.com/kenfinnigan/solder/tree/jboss-logging

Appreciate any comments/feedback as still new at this.

If it's easier for it to be a pull request just let me know.

There will undoubtedly be a few additions to this once I work out how i18n module will look at the best location for some of these changes, solder or i18n.

Thanks
Ken


On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com> wrote:

As a team we need to review Ken's improvements and provide feedback because it's a critical piece of Seam, not to mention it's importance to the i18n API.

Ken, it would be best to post the branch where the changes live (sorry if I'm a step behind if you already have).

- Dan Allen

Sent from my Android-powered phone:
An open platform for carriers, consumers and developers

On Jan 18, 2011 3:30 PM, "Ken Finnigan" <ken@kenfinnigan.me> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 18:49, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I need a Solder release (I'm working on switching to beans.xml), then
>>> I can release the alpha, and a beta quickly for Catch, or we could
>>> still keep it at alpha. Though because it's such an integrated piece
>>> ideally it should be beta.
>>>
>>> I think we should all be using the next release of solder if we can
>>> make sure it works on Glassfish 3.0.1. I'll send a follow-up email
>>> with my latest exception.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Also, please use seam-parent 7 and seam-bom 3.0.0.b06...but stay tuned, I
>> may update to seam-parent 8 to pull in the Weld 1.1.0.Final.
>>
>> -Dan
>>
>> --
>> Dan Allen
>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
>> Registered Linux User #231597
>>
>> http://mojavelinux.com
>> http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
>> http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> seam-dev mailing list
>> seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
>>
>>
> +1 to Solder release, especially after some logging/i18n changes have been
> incorporated from some work I've done with Dan.
>
> In terms of i18n, there are a couple of things I would like to get done for
> the first Beta, as it will likely change the API, that rely on the Solder
> changes. Not sure whether I will be able to get them all complete by
> Wed/Thu, though will see how I go tonight.
>
> Ken