FYI<div><br></div><div>Jira Git Support: <a href="https://plugins.atlassian.com/plugin/details/4984">https://plugins.atlassian.com/plugin/details/4984</a><div>FishEye Git Support: <a href="http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/FE-337">http://jira.atlassian.com/browse/FE-337</a></div>
<div><br></div><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/11/25 Pete Muir <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:pmuir@redhat.com">pmuir@redhat.com</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
On 24 Nov 2009, at 18:34, <a href="http://lightguard.jp" target="_blank">lightguard.jp</a>@<a href="http://gmail.com" target="_blank">gmail.com</a> wrote:<br>
&gt; I&#39;ve looked at both and the one major difference is the branching model in hg.  Many people have coined it &quot;broken&quot; but those may all be in the past.  As far as tooling goes I think you&#39;ll find decent support either way.  Would Fisheye and JIRA still be used or would the services of the host be used instead?  That may also be something to consider.<br>

<br>
</div>We would continue to use JIRA. I guess we wouldn&#39;t use fisheye anymore.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
weld-dev mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org">weld-dev@lists.jboss.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev" target="_blank">https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>--<br>Aslak Knutsen; +47 952 38 791; fax +47 22 33 60 24<br>Kongens gate 14; Boks 805 Sentrum, 0104 Oslo;<br><a href="http://www.conduct.no">http://www.conduct.no</a>; mailto:<a href="mailto:aslak@conduct.no">aslak@conduct.no</a><br>
<br>Conduct AS - Professional Open Source Services<br>- Red Hat/JBoss Premier System Integrator<br>- Pentaho Preferred Integration Partner<br>- Atlassian Technology Partner<br>
</div></div>