On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 1:50 AM, Matt Drees <matt.drees@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Dan,


On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com> wrote:

I really don't like this idea. I want to stick to the Maven standard src/main/webapp or use view. WebContext is a stupid folder name and I've always hated that WTP wouldn't change it to something less lame. Besides, the location is completely configurable in WTP anyway, so it doesn't really care what the folder is called. I've also seen Maven plugins choke when the convention is not followed. So I'm going to hack on src/main/webapp for a couple of days and just see how it pans out.
 

Did the src/main/webapp convention not pan out?  I noticed you've committed examples using the WebContent convention.

Personally, I'd rather see src/main/webapp, if possible.

That's what I'm using for Seam examples. I haven't touch the web beans examples at this point. I want to just run with it in Seam and see how it pans out. To make the switch is actually very simple from a configuration standpoint.

-Dan

--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan

NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily
basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away
from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week,
it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was
caught in the spam filters.  Please don't hesitate to resend a message if
you feel that it did not reach my attention.