I agree with the latter as well. I'd like to see a JIRA project-per-module. I think it makes the most sense, and will prevent future headache, make it easier to track issues related to specific projects.

+1

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Dan Allen <dan.j.allen@gmail.com> wrote:

Q : How will this work with Maven? Won't it be annoying for developers to have to explicitly specify which module to depend on (and update this every time a Seam bundle comes out)?

We'll provide a so called "stack POM" [1], which users can import into their project. They then just bump the Seam version number:

<dependency>
   <groupId>org.jboss.seam</groupId>
   <artifactId>seam-bom</artifactId>
   <version>3.0.2.CR1</version>
   <type>pom</type>
   <scope>import</scope>
</dependency>

+1 This is where we get a lot of milage out of Maven (and dependency management in general).

-Dan 

--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen

_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev




--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"