On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 23:12, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak@redhat.com> wrote:
On 17/08/11 13:05, Dan Allen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 22:57, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak@redhat.com> wrote:
Of course, but we break that rule.  Solder is one example, there's multiple utility classes in the implementation that are required to compile other modules.

I consider that a bug (or a work in progress, depending on how you look at it).

George suggested that we make solder a single jar, and to me it makes sense considering it's a set of utility features, and it would solve this problem.

I don't agree. Solder is not just utility classes. It has very clear APIs and implementations in some places. There is quite a lot of implementation detail, in fact, to implement things like the service handler and the generic beans.

I am okay with moving more of the utility classes into the API, if they truly are utility APIs.

Combining it all is just giving up on good design, IMO.

-Dan
 
--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction