Module leads,<div><br></div><div>When doing releases, we need to align our version numbering scheme. Currently, we are using one scheme in Maven artifacts (3.0.0-Alpha1) and one scheme for downloads (e.g., 3.0.0.Alpha1). Personally, I wouldn&#39;t care which one we use, as long as we use a single scheme. However, it turns out the JBoss has recently established a guideline for version numbers and I think we should follow suit.</div>
<div><br></div><div><a href="http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning" target="_blank">http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning</a></div><div><br></div><div><div><div>major.minor.micro.Alpha[n]</div>
<div>major.minor.micro.Beta[n]</div><div><a href="http://major.minor.micro.CR">major.minor.micro.CR</a>[n]</div><div>major.minor.micro.Final</div></div></div><div><br></div><div>So, if there are no objections, when doing a Seam 3 module release, please use the format 3.x.y.Qualifier[n]. There are some other conventions suggested on that page that you may find useful.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thanks!</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://community.jboss.org/wiki/JBossProjectVersioning" target="_blank"></a>-Dan<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Dan Allen<br>Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action<br>
Registered Linux User #231597<br><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com">http://mojavelinux.com</a><br><a href="http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction">http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction</a><br><a href="http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen">http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen</a><br>

</div>