Are these beans that developers will be interacting with / API? Or are they an implementation detail?

If the former. Why not just use "Twitter" or "Facebook" ?

"Handler" isn't bad, I'm not sure there's a great word, what is the purpose of these beans. e.g: what do they do? that might help us figure out if the name is appropriate, or if we should try to forge a little more ;)

~Lincoln

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine@sabot-durand.net> wrote:
Hi Team,

in Seam social I created bean to deal with social network. I named those Bean with "Handler" suffix : i.e. TwitterHandler. I choose this over "Service" or "Controller" but as there will be other Seam module dealing with high level functional services, I prefer check this naming convention with you. Sharing the same naming convention across modules to have something homogenous is something important.



Antoine SABOT-DURAND
---------------------------------------
Twitter ; http://twitter.com/antoine_sd
LinkedIn : http://fr.linkedin.com/in/antoinesabotdurand










_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev



--
Lincoln Baxter, III
http://ocpsoft.com
http://scrumshark.com
"Keep it Simple"