Are these beans that developers will be interacting with / API? Or are they an implementation detail?

If the former. Why not just use "Twitter" or "Facebook" ?

"Handler" isn't bad, I'm not sure there's a great word, what is the purpose of these beans. e.g: what do they do? that might help us figure out if the name is appropriate, or if we should try to forge a little more ;)


On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Antoine Sabot-Durand <> wrote:
Hi Team,

in Seam social I created bean to deal with social network. I named those Bean with "Handler" suffix : i.e. TwitterHandler. I choose this over "Service" or "Controller" but as there will be other Seam module dealing with high level functional services, I prefer check this naming convention with you. Sharing the same naming convention across modules to have something homogenous is something important.

Twitter ;
LinkedIn :

seam-dev mailing list

Lincoln Baxter, III
"Keep it Simple"