+1 to the sandbox on Deltaspike

Enviado via iPhone

Em 26/06/2012, às 11:37, Jason Porter <lightguard.jp@gmail.com> escreveu:

There's nothing stopping a module from doing their own release. I'd keep it in the 3.1.X releases though to say its compatible with Seam 3.1. I also need to bring up the idea of a DeltaSpike sandbox so we have somewhere to put all these extensions before they are pulled into the core. I haven't gotten to it yet

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:35, Cody Lerum <cody.lerum@gmail.com> wrote:

Maybe we can still do some minor per module 3.1.x releases until DS is ready to accept non-core modules such as mail. Is that reasonable?

Also, I'm still not clear as to the plan for modules such as mail. Last I heard DS was only only going to include core EE the modules (jsf,jpa,cdi enhancement) until it hit a certain point of maturity. Is that still the case?

-C

On Tuesday, June 26, 2012, Shane Bryzak wrote:
We're not planning on continuing with any further releases for Seam 3.x, there's an incredible amount of resources required to test and prepare for a release.  Instead, we should be focusing all of our efforts on DeltaSpike for any new features and ongoing development.

On 22/06/12 09:55, Cody Lerum wrote:
I've recently had some improvements and bug fixes commited to the Seam
mail module and I would like to get them out in the open in
non-SNAPSHOT form.

Is a 3.1.1 release still being planned, or would it be possible to do
individual module releases as needed?

-C
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev
_______________________________________________
seam-dev mailing list
seam-dev@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev