Thanks for raising this George.

Both of these modules are really on fire right now (come to think of it, that's true of a lot of modules). But anyway, definitely look through them. That's what really matters early on. And it's really easy to browse the code on github [1] [2]. Hint, focus on the APIs. (Type 't' to see all files and navigate them) 

Unfortunately, at this point you can only comment on commits, so simply post to the mailinglist or chat in IRC if you want to provide general feedback.

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 00:47, George Gastaldi <gegastaldi@gmail.com> wrote:
I encourage to extend that good practice whenever is possible to other
modules as well.
Could be a topic to discuss on the meeting next week.

George and Antoine got me thinking that perhaps we should have a "request for review" section on the project site (or some other feed mechanism) so that you can see what's currently "up for review". This should help passer-byes know when and where to jump in.

I recommend using this template for requesting a review:

Module: (e.g., Social)
Type: (e.g., code | documentation | example)
Focus: (e.g., APIs, type names, implementation strategy, etc)
Other notes: 

The clearer the focus, the more feedback you are likely going to get (since people know what to look for).

-Dan

[1] https://github.com/seam/social
[2] https://github.com/seam/reports

--
Dan Allen
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen#about
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction