On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 6:05 AM, Pete Muir
<pmuir@redhat.com> wrote:
Agreed, the interceptor is definitely part of the public API - they have to reference the class in their beans.xml.
Yep, and beans.xml must be considered "their code" (as a counter to Shane's point).
Having it in the javadoc is no replacement for a decent ref guide, but can be useful for some IMO.
Should we have Maven build merge JavaDoc for interceptors and decorators into the JavaDoc for the api/ module? This should be possible based on name filtering (i.e., *Interceptor, *Decorator). It will require some build trickery, though.
-Dan