I will. Thanks.

-Dan

On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Shane Bryzak <sbryzak@redhat.com> wrote:
We have some guidelines here, could you please update them Dan:

http://www.seamframework.org/Seam3/ModuleReleaseProcedure




On 30/03/10 14:10, Dan Allen wrote:
Module leads,

When doing releases, we need to align our version numbering scheme. Currently, we are using one scheme in Maven artifacts (3.0.0-Alpha1) and one scheme for downloads (e.g., 3.0.0.Alpha1). Personally, I wouldn't care which one we use, as long as we use a single scheme. However, it turns out the JBoss has recently established a guideline for version numbers and I think we should follow suit.


major.minor.micro.Alpha[n]
major.minor.micro.Beta[n]
major.minor.micro.Final

So, if there are no objections, when doing a Seam 3 module release, please use the format 3.x.y.Qualifier[n]. There are some other conventions suggested on that page that you may find useful.

Thanks!

-Dan

--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
_______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev




--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597

http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen