I'm pretty sure the surefire problems with TestNG have been resolved (at least in Maven 2.0.9 and above). So +1 from me -Dan On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Christian Bauer <christian.bauer(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: I want to upgrade TestNG from 5.6 to 5.9, however, there is this comment in build/core.pom.xml: <!-- Surefire can't cope with such a new version of testng, so we have to specify it here, otherwise ui build fails --> <dependency> <groupId>org.testng</groupId> <artifactId>testng</artifactId> <version>5.6</version> <optional>true</optional> <exclusions> <exclusion> <groupId>junit</groupId> <artifactId>junit</artifactId> </exclusion> </exclusions> </dependency> After switching this to 5.9 I've had a clean build and tests. Can we get this into 2.2 GA? If yes, I can probably commit some nice enhancements to test infrastructure (dbunit, resteasy) tomorrow. _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev -- Dan Allen Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action http://mojavelinux.com http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Dan NOTE: While I make a strong effort to keep up with my email on a daily basis, personal or other work matters can sometimes keep me away from my email. If you contact me, but don't hear back for more than a week, it is very likely that I am excessively backlogged or the message was caught in the spam filters. Please don't hesitate to resend a message if you feel that it did not reach my attention. _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

On Jul 08, 2009, at 10:17 , Marek Novotny wrote: > exactly, I have upgraded to 5.8 in EAP and all is OK. It only requires > to upgrade surefire plugin to 2.4.3 Being a !Maven, do I have to do anything in a Seam POM or is that up to the individual? _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

On Jul 08, 2009, at 10:29 , Marek Novotny wrote: > hmm, I don't understand what you mean, anyway look at > http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/Seam/?cs=11223 Did all of this, except commenting out the maven_central thing in root.pom.xml which doesn't exist in Seam base. I had to remove the <classifier>jdk15</classifier> in ui.pom.xml though. You apparently did the same, then added it back before committing? _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev

On Jul 08, 2009, at 10:58 , Marek Novotny wrote: > Correct. > > > Christian Bauer píše v St 08. 07. 2009 v 10:50 +0200: >> On Jul 08, 2009, at 10:29 , Marek Novotny wrote: >> >>> hmm, I don't understand what you mean, anyway look at >>> http://fisheye.jboss.org/changelog/Seam/?cs=11223 >> >> Did all of this, except commenting out the maven_central thing in >> root.pom.xml which doesn't exist in Seam base. I had to remove the >> <classifier>jdk15</classifier> in ui.pom.xml though. You apparently >> did the same, then added it back before committing? Ah, so it looks like for TestNG 5.9 we only have the jdk15 version in the repository anyway, according to the central maven repository hashes. Any particular reasons why a) you didn't use 5.9 and b) the JBoss repo has different layout for 5.9 compared to 5.8 and maven central? _______________________________________________ seam-dev mailing list seam-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/seam-dev