What do you think about the following:
picketlink/2
2.1.7.Final/
2.5.0.Beta3/
latest-2.1
latest-2.5
latest
Also, I had a discussion with Shane about the v3 resources (docs, tags, links to
downloads, etc), they can be very confusing for users. Wondering if we should wipe out the
existence of v3 altogether or if you prefer to retain them as a history ?
Regards.
Pedro Igor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Anil Saldhana" <asaldhan(a)redhat.com>
To: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
Cc: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:36:09 PM
Subject: Re: [security-dev] [PicketLink] - Version 2.5.0.Beta3 Released
Pedro - I think we should do /2/5 and point /2/latest to this location.
We definitely need the /2/1 location for the documentation for 2.1.7
On May 20, 2013, at 6:26 PM, Pedro Igor Silva <psilva(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Sorry, the correct location for documentation is:
http://docs.jboss.org/picketlink/2/latest/
Thanks.
Pedro Igor
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pedro Igor Silva" <psilva(a)redhat.com>
To: security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 3:35:18 PM
Subject: [security-dev] [PicketLink] - Version 2.5.0.Beta3 Released
Hi All,
Today we released PicketLink 2.5.0.Beta3. For now on, PicketLink versions will follow
the v2.5.x series, as discussed in this list.
Documentation can be obtained from:
http://docs.jboss.org/picketlink/3/latest
Issues for this version:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310923&v...
Regards.
Pedro Igor
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev