Re: [security-dev] Compilation issues on PicketLink repository

Shane/Pedro, I think we have to figure out a way by which we do not affect projects such as Aerogear with our compilation issues. I think we should just cut checkpoints frequently. The projects using PL need to be on checkpoints.

This occurrence of compilation problem was from Pedro. He buys us beer next time. :) Regards, Anil On 10/30/2012 08:53 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote: > Bruno, > > challenges of unification. Hopefully the CI build notifications will > help us get better. But this is a rare occurrence of compilation issue. > > That is why I suggest frequent checkpoint releases from PL such that > projects such as Aerogear can depend on checkpoints rather than snapshots. > > Regards, > Anil > > On 10/30/2012 08:34 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote: >> Good morning everyone. >> >> We on AeroGear have been using PicketBox and PicktLink for real, in >> nowadays have 3 real dependencies: >> >> - picketbox-cdi which depends on picketbox-core >> - picketbox-core which depends on picketlink >> - picketlink >> >> Today I'm facing with compilation issues on PicketLink repository >> (https://github.com/picketlink/picketlink/commits/master), I know >> about the fact that PicketLink is a work in progress, but I would like >> to ask a favour. >> >> If the code doesn't compile and that's a working in progress could you >> please create a separated branch for it until the compilation issues >> are fixed? >> >> _______________________________________________ security-dev mailing list security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev