Re: [security-dev] PicketLink3 and Apache Deltaspike Dependencies

Scratch this plan. Shane and I determined that this is larger than we originally thought -> lots of DS classes need to be forked. On 02/13/2013 10:25 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote: > Hi all, > PicketLink3 is on the final stretch of release cycles. One of the > concerns I have had is the Apache Deltaspike dependency which is some > type of incubating snapshot. Since there are very few Deltaspike classes > (3-5 in number) that we depend on, the following strategy should work: > - Copy the source files (Retaining Apache Headers) as it is from Apache > Deltaspike to a PicketLink namespace such as : org.picketlink.deltaspike.* > - Remove the Apache Deltaspike dependency. > > In few months, when Apache Deltaspike has proper releases, we can remove > the PicketLink Deltaspike forked classes and bring back the Apache > Deltaspike dependency back. I do not think PicketLink users will > directly code to DS classes. > > I ran this with Pete Muir, Shane and Jason Porter and they all agreed > that this is a good strategy (I did refine the strategy based on Shane's > comments). > > Regards, > Anil _______________________________________________ security-dev mailing list security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev