Re: [security-dev] PicketLink Version and "Core" Module name
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
a) I am presuming we have agreement that the PicketLink version for
the
consolidated workspace should be v3.x
+1 We're using picketlink-idm-restored now and I'm not comfortable with it.
We should get it merged sooner than later against the main picketlink repository.
b) Regarding the module name "core" that most of us want
renamed to "cdi".
I do not see issues with it called "core" as long as PL 2.x federation
users on non-ee environments upgrading to PL3 do not have a requirement
to have CDI/Weld jars. Ideally we cannot force users to require Weld
jars to run SAML on tomcat, for example.
I'm fine with either, we're building software, we can change if it doesn't
work.
_______________________________________________
security-dev mailing list
security-dev(a)lists.jboss.org (mailto:security-dev@lists.jboss.org)
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/security-dev
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.1 KB)