Sure will test it beginning on Monday, when I will travel to the customer
site. Regards.
On Aug 7, 2013 1:03 PM, "Anil Saldhana" <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Fernando,
code is merged into the v2.1.8 workspace at
https://github.com/picketlink2/federation
Pull:
https://github.com/picketlink2/federation/pull/188
Testing:
https://gist.github.com/anilsaldhana/70b61759143f2fd134dc
I hope you can test it.
Feedback welcome.
https://github.com/picketlink2/federation/blob/master/picketlink-core/src...
https://github.com/picketlink2/federation/blob/master/picketlink-core/src...
https://github.com/picketlink2/federation/blob/master/picketlink-core/src...
Regards,
Anil
On 08/06/2013 04:13 PM, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:
Great, I have updated PLINK2-97 and asked the WF team what to do with
WFLY-1691. Regards.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>wrote:
> Fernando,
> finished the code. I am going to test with a DB on my laptop before
> checking.
>
> Regards,
> Anil
>
>
> On 08/06/2013 03:52 PM, Fernando Ribeiro wrote:
>
> Anil,
>
> I surely can, will have two POC environments (PL cluster + MySQL cluster)
> for many weeks.
>
> Thank you very much for the attention to the issue, I really appreciated
> it.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:54 PM, Anil Saldhana
<Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>wrote:
>
>>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK2-101
>>
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/PLINK2-102
>>
>> I hope Fernando can help test this. :)
>>
>> On 08/06/2013 10:30 AM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/wildfly-dev/2013-August/000574.html
>>> (thanks to Jason, Bill and Scott Marlow for the discussion)
>>>
>>> Jason has provided some objections to the JPA usage in PicketLink that
>>> can affect Wildfly boot time performance. He had raised this concern
>>> last time for the JPAIdentityStore implementation in PicketLink v2.5
>>> which we have been trying to mitigate via the implementation of a JDBC
>>> driven Identity Store.
>>>
>>> The discussion happening in the thread above however is for the
>>> JPABasedTokenRegistry and JPABasedRevocationRegistry part of v2.1.x
>>> which predates PicketLink v2.5
>>>
>>>
https://github.com/picketlink2/federation/blob/master/picketlink-core/src...
>>>
>>>
https://github.com/picketlink2/federation/blob/master/picketlink-core/src...
>>>
>>> I think we should also implement a straight JDBC based token registry
>>> and revocation registry to avoid the Wildfly boot drag.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Anil
>>>
>>
>
>