I will be working with Bill to streamline our OAuth implementation. I
dont care if OAuth stays in RESTEasy or PicketLink as long as our users
have support for OAuth from JBoss community.
On 02/20/2013 09:55 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
'kk what's the plan for PicketLink use amber
(
https://github.com/picketlink/picketlink/tree/master/oauth/src/main/java/...)
or Bill's implementation?
Or both?
--
"The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
-
@abstractj
-
Volenti Nihil Difficile
On Wednesday, February 20, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
> I think that is the usecase for implicit grant type in OAuth2. It
> is used when the client cannot save any secrets or tokens such as
> Javascript applications.
>
> Regards,
> Anil
>
> On 02/20/2013 05:42 AM, Bruno Oliveira wrote:
>> Hi Anil,
>>
>> Are you thinking in something like this?
>>
https://developers.google.com/accounts/docs/OAuth2#clientside
>>
>> If yes, makes sense.
>>
>>
>> --
>> "The measure of a man is what he does with power" - Plato
>> -
>> @abstractj
>> -
>> Volenti Nihil Difficile
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Anil Saldhana wrote:
>>
>>> I am unsure if "implicit" usecase implies insecure. All it does is
>>> avoids the intermediate
>>> authorization code grant step. It is useful for Javascript applications
>>
>