Re: [security-dev] common module in picketlink

Thanks Anil, I don't have any objections. Let me know if you want some help from me. Marek On 24/01/13 15:56, Anil Saldhana wrote: > Marek, > I do not think I have any objections. I will create the common > module on Monday and do a bunch of "git mv" to start the common module > going. > > If there are any objections/feedback, we have until Monday. > > Regards, > Anil > > On 01/18/2013 11:09 AM, Marek Posolda wrote: >> I mentioned yesterday that it may be good to have something like >> separate "common" module, which will contain some stuff and >> functionalities, which may be needed across all other picketlink modules. >> >> Example of such things could be: >> - Class StringUtil from federation module (Some stuff in this class is >> specific to federation, but some common methods like >> StringUtil.isNotNull, StringUtil.getSystemPropertyAsString etc. are >> useful in other modules as well) >> - Probably some other util classes in federation >> - Some parts of logging >> - Reflection and properties helper classes from IDM module >> - Base64 util class (Currently we have same class forked two times in >> picketlink project. Once in "federation" module and once in "idm" module) >> - Probably some more... >> >> wdyt? >> Marek